|
Post by Severus on May 16, 2002 8:21:27 GMT -5
Sorry CPI but I just get really pissed off with the homophobia eminating from RL fans (see my poll). I for one haven't got a problem with my sexuality and would happily support and play alongside anyone who was lesbian, gay or bisexual. It seems as though our friends up north need to learn a little tolerance for people of a different sexual persausion to themselves.
|
|
|
Post by Clive_Woody on May 16, 2002 8:44:45 GMT -5
They can be an intolerant bunch the league Muppets!
A telling off from CPI should sort them out - Go Girl, you tell'em! ;D
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchInfant on May 16, 2002 8:45:32 GMT -5
I know Sev, I feel the same! Tolerance would be lovely, but that will come after World Peace!!!
ok - just seen Clive's posting. It seems to me that us pro-union types are a lot more friendly and welcoming to all that many of the leaguies. Can we please stop all this homophobic nonsense. We get come on this board because we can tollerate each other's view and get on - otherwise we'd all have got pissed off with each other and never come back to this site. Why does sexuality have to be different??? If you are comfortable in your own sexuality, why do you feel the need to be confrontational about other people's? Small minds???
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchInfant on May 16, 2002 8:50:21 GMT -5
Sorry - must stop putting more than 2 ?s together, else we get little faces
Sozza!
|
|
|
Post by kev_hullfc on May 16, 2002 8:57:54 GMT -5
I agree the posts had nothing what's so ever to do with the original subject of dirty lesbian union players. However am i dectecting a sense of naievety from the union fans with regards to the homophobia emulating from the league fans.
|
|
|
Post by Clive_Woody on May 16, 2002 9:34:09 GMT -5
I have just noticed that I have posted over 250 messages and I still only have 2 stars, does anybody know when I get my next one?
Sorry to change the subject away from lesbians Kev! ;D
|
|
exxile
Full Member
Posts: 1,066
|
Post by exxile on May 16, 2002 11:36:33 GMT -5
I suspect most of your posts are for no other reason than to obtain your third star.
|
|
exxile
Full Member
Posts: 1,066
|
Post by exxile on May 16, 2002 11:45:56 GMT -5
CPI wrote: ...er, because it is abnorma,l perverted and generally disgusting behaviour perhaps. Not very 'fashionable' to say it these days. I also resent the amount of money spent on AIDS compared to other more worthy medical conditions, just because there are lots of high profile perverts who think they might get it. I'm prepared to be converted if you think you have an argument.
|
|
|
Post by Clive_Woody on May 17, 2002 4:56:14 GMT -5
I suspect most of your posts are for no other reason than to obtain your third star. Maybe! ;D
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchInfant on May 17, 2002 4:56:36 GMT -5
"Abnormal" ? - the ancient Romans thought that love of another bloke was the highest form of love - they were gay back then!
Just because it's not your cup of tea, doesn't mean that you shouldn't be tollerant of others for whom it is. You don't like Union, but you tollerate the fact that many other people do!
You've linked AIDS to homosexuality - there is now a higher infection rate in straight people than in gay people, so your logic for not spending money on one of the worlds biggest killers is a little suspect. And how is 1 killer disease more "worthy" than another. Just because you don't catch cancer from having sex, does that make it more worthy?
Go visit Africa (would suggest you avoid malaria it's not pleasant, although would be interesting to know if it's a more "worthy" disease) and go into some of the villages. I was lucky enough to be taken around a village in Malawi by the Chief's son and I got to spend time with the children. They were the happiest & best behaved bunch of kids I've ever had the pleasure of meeting. Whilst chatting to the Chief's son on the way back, he told me that 80% of those kids will never live to adulthood - it was heartbreaking. I'm happy to listen to your argument as to why those kids don't deserve the chance of life.
|
|
|
Post by windlesaint on May 17, 2002 6:33:09 GMT -5
The object of sex is procreation. Now this is done by men shagging women. That is what a) the todger and b) the quim is for! One man sticking his nob up another man's arse is not procreation. On the contrary it is a disgusting, wanton, seedy act of decadence and deprivation. Any one partaking of such an act should be ashamed to show their face in public not mince about as if it is to be applauded.
|
|
|
Post by kev_hullfc on May 17, 2002 6:43:22 GMT -5
So were do you stand on lesbianism? It may not be procreation but it's bloody fantastic to watch.
|
|
|
Post by Clive_Woody on May 17, 2002 6:52:01 GMT -5
Kev, you should be on telly, you are not afraid of speaking your mind, you say what you see, and what you see normally has an 18 rating! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Clive_Woody on May 17, 2002 6:55:19 GMT -5
Not wishing to sounds as if I am just playing the devils advocate, but if the purpose of sex if purley for procreation then I assume whoever it was that made this statement (Windy?) does not believe in contraception? How many children do you have so far then? ;D
|
|
|
Post by CabbagePatchInfant on May 17, 2002 7:26:46 GMT -5
The object of sex is procreation. Now this is done by men shagging women. That is what a) the todger and b) the quim is for! One man sticking his nob up another man's arse is not procreation. On the contrary it is a disgusting, wanton, seedy act of decadence and deprivation. Any one partaking of such an act should be ashamed to show their face in public not mince about as if it is to be applauded. Windbag, your girlfriend / fiance / wife must be VERY disappointed if you only have sex to have kids!! Kev, can't agree with you on watching lesbians I'm afraid. People can do what they want, but I don't think I'd care to watch it!! How come men like to watch lesbians, but I've never met a single woman who wants to watch 2 gay men!
|
|